New Law on Credit Institutions 2024 (Part 3)

This post continues discussing some additional changes of the Law on Credit Institution 2024 (LCI 2024). For changes discussed in our Part 1, please see here, in Part 2, please see here.

1.         More comment on security agent

As discussed in Part 2, LCI 2024 allows security agent operation. However, the relevant provision of LCI 2024 has the following limitations:

1.1.      such provision does not clarify the nature of security agent and whether it is the relation of representative (đại diện) or authorization (ủy quyền) as stipulated under the Civil Code. Under LCI 2024, the activity of security agent is implemented under the provisions of relevant laws, without further clarifying which relevant laws are; and

1.2.      LCI 2024 does not provide any details on what a security agent can do (such as definition of security agent or the role of the security agent).

2.         New classification for letter of credit

LCI 2024 no longer classifies letter of credit operation as a payment service provided via account (dịch vụ thanh toán qua tài khoản). LCI 2024 now defines letter of credit as a form of credit extension through the issuance, confirmation, negotiation, payment and return of letter of credit.

Read MoreInfo
Comment
Written by Nguyen Quang Vu On In

Where in the law foreign investors get better treatment over Vietnamese investors?

One can assume that where possible (i.e., not prohibited by international treaties) Vietnamese law will likely provide better treatment to Vietnamese investors over foreign investor. However, in the examples discussed below, foreign investors do get better treatment over Vietnamese investors:

  • Investor protection - The biggest advantage that many foreign investors have over Vietnamese investors is the ability of the foreign investor to make a claim against Vietnamese Government before international arbitration under various investment treaties that Vietnam has signed with several countries. Vietnamese investors have no ability to do so. The Government of Vietnam has indeed been subject to several investor-State disputes and is well aware of the risk that it can be sued if it mistreats foreign investors.

Read MoreInfo
Comment
Written by Nguyen Quang Vu On In ,

Understanding the Legal Status of "Other Legal Documents" Published on the Official Gazette

The Official Gazette (Công Báo) publishes legal instruments (văn bản quy phạm pháp luật) issued in accordance with the Law on Law. However, the Official Gazette also has a section which publishes “other legal documents” (Văn bản pháp luật khác). It is not clear if these “other legal documents”, which are not legal instruments, will have the force of law.

The Law on Legal Instruments (or Law on Laws) defines a legal provision (quy phạm pháp luật) to mean a general rule of conduct, with universal binding force, applied repeatedly to agencies, organizations, and individuals within the entire country or a specific administrative unit, as prescribed by a competent state agency in this Law and ensured by the State. A legal instrument (văn bản quy phạm pháp luật) is a document containing legal provisions issued in accordance with the Law on Legal Instruments and must be published on the Official Gazette. The Law on Legal Instrument prohibits the issuance of documents which are not a legal instrument but which contain legal provisions. Since the “other legal documents” published on Official Gazette are not issued in accordance with the Law on Legal Instruments, they should not contain a legal provision and should not have the force of law.

Read MoreInfo
Comment
Written by Nguyen Quang Vu On In

The concept of indirect subsidiaries of a parent company under the Enterprise Law 2020

It is unclear whether indirect ownership or control is taken into account when determining a company is the parent company of another company. Under Article 195.1 of the Enterprise Law 2020, a company will be deemed to be a parent company of another company in one of the following circumstances:

  • the former owns more than 50% of the charter capital or the total number of ordinary shares of the latter;

  • the former has the right to directly or indirectly appoint “the majority or all directors of the Board, Director or the General Director” of the latter; or

  • the former has the right to amend the charter of the latter.

The above definition makes it unclear because indirect control is only clearly mentioned in the case of appointing Board directors and Director (General Director) (i.e. the second limb).

Read MoreInfo
Comment
Written by Nguyen Quang Vu On In ,