New Bank Lending Regulations Circular 39/2016 (2)

On 14 March 2017, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) has issued an Official Letter No. 1576/NHNN-CSTT (OL 1576) explaining several points of its Circular 39/2016, including:

confirmation that applicable interest rate of a loan can be described in general in a frame loan agreement and specified (with conversion to per cent per annum) in a relevant debenture note;
confirmation that commitment fee can only be applied one time only; and
a further guidance that if the bank and its customer agree on an interest rate calculated on the basis of a year having 360 days, then the loan agreement also has to include an interest rate calculated on the basis of a year having 365 days;
if the repayment period is restructured, overdue interest can be applied to overdue interest amount but it cannot be accumulated over overdue principal amount during the extended period; and
regarding floating interest, if the formula or its calculating factor is not clear which resulted to different interest rates, the lowest one shall be applied by default.

One important change made by Circular 39/2016 is that the loan period will start on the day immediately after the disbursement date rather than the disbursement date itself as provided by previous legislation. Consequently, interest payable by the borrower will also have to be calculated on that day. This change may appear small in theory but could cause material change in practice. This is because most banks are using software to calculate interest. And it appears that many systems have been set up according to previous practice which cannot be easily changed to reflect the change introduced by Circular 39/2016. The SBV however has not offered any clarification on this point.

This post is contributed by Nguyen Hoang Duy, an associate at Venture North Law Limited.

Info

Comment

Mortgage or pledge of future assets in Vietnam

The Civil Code 2015 recognises that future assets can be used as security. Future assets are assets which do not exist at the time of creation of the relevant security or which exist at the time of creation of the relevant security but do not belong to the ownership of the relevant mortgagor or pledgor. However, it is not clear how a mortgage or pledge over a future asset which is not owned by the mortgagor at the time of creation of the mortgage or pledge could reconcile with the requirement that the mortgagor or pledgor must own the mortgaged assets under the Civil Code 2015.

Info

Comment

Circular 39/2016 - New Lending Regulations for Banks in Vietnam

The State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) issued Circular 39/2016 in late December 2016 replacing the famous Decision 1627/2001 on lending by banks and other credit institutions in Vietnam which has been in force for more than a decade. Circular 39/2016 contains the following developments, among other things:

To terminate a loan agreement and accelerate the loan, a bank must prove that the borrower has provided inaccurate information or breached the loan agreement or the security agreements. While further clarifications are still required, this limitation may reduce the ability of a bank to call an event of default under the existing loan agreement. For example, defaults caused by a third party (e.g. a guarantor) may not satisfy the new requirement under Circular 39/2016.

Stricter regulations on issuance of Vietnamese Government guarantees

Under Decree 4/2017, the Vietnamese Government imposes stricter regulations on issuance and management of Government guarantees. Government guarantees under Decree 4/2017 are guarantees issued on behalf of the Vietnamese Government (as the guarantor) in favour of foreign lenders to guarantee loans or bonds borrowed or issued by companies in Vietnam. Under Decree 4/2017:

Vietnam Business Law